Non-identical designations
Nabatali GulamoghluDOI: doi.org/10.48445/v8120-0294-5058-r
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6241-4490
Date: 26 January 2024
ABSTRACT
In the article, a brief excursion into the research history of non-homogeneous determinations is made. Here, it was considered appropriate to study the non- homogeneous designations in a comparative manner. It is no secret that non- homogeneous designations have been widely studied neither in Azerbaijani nor in Russian languages. It was for this reason that it was emphasized that there is considerable uncertainty about it. Both languages were compared from this point of view, and the means of expression of dissimilar definitions were shown. The results of the research conducted by our linguists on non-homogeneous designations are summarized. Most importantly, it has been emphasized that until now appointments have not been classified in relation to the appointee. For the first time in our history of linguistics, a classification was made based on this principle. Samples of each species included in the classification were given and analyzed. The author used schemes to reinforce his ideas. In the diagrams, the syntactic relations between the determiner, the determiner, and the determined areshown.
KEYWORDS
definition, determination of appointment, inhomogeneous definition, homogeneous definition, determinable