Articles

Comparison of Syntactic-Semantic Features of Sentences and Incomplete Sentences

ABSTRACT

Incomplete sentences belong to the system of participle sentences and can be expressed by all sentence members. It is especially useful to compare them with a sentence in order to determine precisely the coordinations that belong to incomplete sentences. These two sentence types have an apparently synonymous effect from a structural-semantic point of view. Because both sentence types have a dialogic structure in terms of communicative form. In incomplete sentences, one or both members involved in the expression of the idea are omitted. If one or more members of a single or double short and long sentence are omitted and these members can be easily restored, such sentences are called incomplete sentences. The word refers to a group of simple sentences that are not divided into members, that is, they are not members. Missing members in incomplete sentences can be recovered based on the context in the text. However, this is not possible in the sentence, because there is no need for it because the attitude to the original idea is expressed here. In general, connected speech should not be incomplete in content; this incompleteness is observed only in the form compared to its whole variants that can be used independently. Understanding these differences contributes to a deeper understanding of language usage.

KEYWORDS

syntactic-semantic feature, speech environment, communicative function, member sentence, stylistic aspect, contextual situation